-
metaviv journethics CraigSilverman emilybell craignewmark mosseri _trustproject jonkeegan Mantzarlis The whitelist idea is cool, but I'm always wary of centralized authorities in this manner. It would be interesting if publications maintained their own public-facing whitelists that could be assessed for trust in combination with certification or meta-data compliance.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +4 🙂
-
metaviv journethics CraigSilverman emilybell craignewmark mosseri _trustproject jonkeegan Mantzarlis And I'm not at all opposed to the Trust Project metas (the more metadata the better), I'm just very wary of suggesting it be used as signals for platforms to base trust on until we have a method to block bad actors from using them...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
metaviv journethics CraigSilverman emilybell craignewmark mosseri _trustproject jonkeegan Mantzarlis Without that, we end up creating an even more detailed layer for fraud to be committed on and we burn the bridge on those trust signals being reliable before we can really get to use them. IMO: when it comes to establishing trust metadata each attempt has only one shot.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
metaviv journethics CraigSilverman emilybell craignewmark mosseri _trustproject jonkeegan Mantzarlis We saw that with Google's authorship project. It was a great idea that could have been hugely beneficial, but because it was easier to exploit than honestly enact it ended up making things worse before it was turned off entirely.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁
-
metaviv journethics CraigSilverman emilybell craignewmark mosseri _trustproject jonkeegan Mantzarlis Worth noting, for the whitelist idea, some large and medium publishers already maintain whitelists of legit news orgs on the commercial side as part of the process of recirculation, arbitrage, and distribution.On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂