-
Rustyk5 She can do a better job explaining why their ideas are dangerous and give more space to scientists who can explain why. Imagine this same article, but instead of 'raw water', it said antibiotics. Would this level of unchallenged claims still be acceptable?On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
Rustyk5 If challenging the claims is too boring of an article, then don't do the article at all. The NYT is read by Alex Jones fans as well as people who think the juice guy is an idiot. Good journalism is written to give the same message to all readers. This article fails that test.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -5 🙁