Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 86,357

  1. What a bunch of dumbasses, that the New York Times only interviews one mildly challenging source and barely manages research is an embarrassment. This is very nearly a press release under a reporters byline and a case study for how not to cover tech. nyti.ms/2EeITEa
    OpenGraph image for nyti.ms/2EeITEa
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Following these idiots down their shitty path is dangerous, on the same level as uncritically reporting on the bullshit conspiracies of suburban anti vaccine parents.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Also worth noting: the government has many regulations that deal with air quality.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          One of the sources mainly has an expertise in terrible ideas and admits to breaking the law in the article and he is never challenged in any real way.
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            A parenthetical here is not sufficient!
            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              There are 9 pro "raw water" sources and 1 scientist explaining why it is a bad idea, who barely is given the space to directly challenge the assertions of the crazy millionaires.
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                This is not just dumb and wrong, it is dangerous, foolish and goes unchallenged in the body of the article following this statement!
                oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  YOU ARE CITING ALEX JONES AS A SOURCE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES.
                  oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    Also, since half of the article is people saying the water "tastes better" somehow, perhaps the reporter should report on how it tastes, or why they chose not to taste it?
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      This is bad journalism.
                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                            With basic freaking science!
                            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API


Search tweets' text