-
Own your platform Own your platform Own your platform Except how does this work if you do social video? :/ Chronotope/913467685907959809
-
It's easy to forget this, but self-hosting video content for small media or individuals is very much an unsolved problem.
-
Hosting video is worthless to YouTube unless they can run ads on it. It costs them infrastructure & earns nothing. Of course this occurs.
-
Speaks to the unrealized problem of pivoting to video - hosting streaming video is *expensive.* Crowd funding is great for creators/viewers
-
It's awful for YouTube as a platform and a business. No one really thought this through until now, but it is Time To Have A Talk about it.
-
I'm not excusing YouTube's rollout or behavior here. This was badly done, badly messaged, and way too specifically targeted
-
This marks something real interesting. For YouTube to make this move, monetization of video must be moving away from preroll in a big way.
-
Like turning off external tweet counts this is the sort of move that screams 'our infrastructure is costing more than it is earning'.
-
It also is an indicator that users would rather pay directly for video (or deal with product placement) than deal with preroll...
-
... which points to the fundamental problem w/Google's AMP-style attempts to fix the web. The problem is ad tech, not what holds that tech
-
By trying to change how the web works instead of fixing the advertising technology they're destroying their own ecosystem by repelling users
-
Anywho. Platforms are not solved for all content types. In fact they are not solved for most, prob some opportunities there.
-
Maybe someone should turn open.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/using-microservices-to-encode-and-publish-videos-at-the-new-york-times/?mcubz=3&_r=0 into an open source video CMS?
Chronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 81,678