-
Huh. Who knew the best vertical for The Outline was "writing things about The New York Times that a public editor should have written"Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 6 Favorites
Mood +3 🙂
-
Seriously, NYT's op-ed section section and batting home runs off them outline/904237564508418048Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Not to mention general media criticism outline/903740548749643776Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁
-
Taking on Vice too. outline/904143897227612160Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Here's another one aimed squarely at NYT outline/903464332893282304Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Not making a judgement call on the quality of the work, but I consider this evidence to a theory I've been rolling around:Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
B/c media is the most prominent & amplifying portion of Twitter's userbase, easiest way to get quick traffic boosts is tweet media criticismPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
New publications end up trying to establish new traffic baselines lean heavily into media criticism, not cynically but by following metrics.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁
-
See also: the early publications of The Intercept.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
The end result is new media voices that don't put some portion of concentration towards media criticism won't stack up against competitors.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
And then they fail, which is BS. Because the media criticism traffic bubble will prob pop when a pub flips to other stuff. Flighty audience.On twitter.com
Mood -4 🙁
-
I'm not saying we don't need media on media. Just that pubs and VC are likely using the wrong models to determine who and what is successfulPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
Unless your goal is to become a publication that only does media criticism I guess.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁