Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 80,018

              1. To be clear: no legitimate journalist trusted Breitbart before Bannon left, but people are going to start trusting it now?
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              A stint in the Trump Whit House doesn't do anything to make that site less of a racist, lying, bullying, bullshit-artist of an organization.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            Mby treat it like any other source you don't trust & don't report what it says uncritically and without secondary verification?
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          If you're a blue checkmark journalist on this platform don't give it money or legitimacy by linking to their trash. A: Basic Fking Ethics...
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        B: This is a social platform which means that you are creating, amplifying and perhaps enhancing a network effect for Breitbart!...
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      So when you, someone w/a blue checkmark, link to a Breitbart article, you're increasing the chance for that *and* future articles to show...
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    You're increasing the chance that Breitbart is a source on Trending or in Moments, or in the Search tab. Because you're a trusted node.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      This isn't your backroom news org's Slack. Don't give them exactly what they want by uncritically linking, or linking at all.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        That's a violation of basic journalistic ethics and makes it harder to get good reporting out. You're making us all less trustworthy.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          If you want to discuss something on there, treat it as unverified until YOU verify it and do this: losowsky/898885898355392512


Search tweets' text