-
To be clear: no legitimate journalist trusted Breitbart before Bannon left, but people are going to start trusting it now?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 5 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
A stint in the Trump Whit House doesn't do anything to make that site less of a racist, lying, bullying, bullshit-artist of an organization.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -5 🙁
-
Mby treat it like any other source you don't trust & don't report what it says uncritically and without secondary verification?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
If you're a blue checkmark journalist on this platform don't give it money or legitimacy by linking to their trash. A: Basic Fking Ethics...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood 0
-
B: This is a social platform which means that you are creating, amplifying and perhaps enhancing a network effect for Breitbart!...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
So when you, someone w/a blue checkmark, link to a Breitbart article, you're increasing the chance for that *and* future articles to show...On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
You're increasing the chance that Breitbart is a source on Trending or in Moments, or in the Search tab. Because you're a trusted node.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +4 🙂
-
This isn't your backroom news org's Slack. Don't give them exactly what they want by uncritically linking, or linking at all.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
That's a violation of basic journalistic ethics and makes it harder to get good reporting out. You're making us all less trustworthy.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
If you want to discuss something on there, treat it as unverified until YOU verify it and do this: losowsky/898885898355392512Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂