Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 77,518

        1. What is Google's legal responsibility towards the hosting of content through AMP?
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Because here's the thing: Facebook Instant Articles are only accessible through the app, but AMP is on the general web.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      That means that Google is acting like a web host, but a very particular type, one enacting significant content restrictions, tho tech ones
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    I ask this for a reason, you see. What responsibility does Google have when hosting Fake News? Do we consider it a web host?
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Could we, should we, exert economic pressure on Google for essentially amplifying Breitbart? (in the style of slpng_giants )?
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        We all agreed that this was both bad and in their control gizmodo.com/google-wont-alter-the-holocaust-denying-results-for-di-1790025043 so why isn't this use of AMP?
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          If Facebook is going to be required to remove hate speech by countries, shouldn't same restrictions apply to AMP? m.dw.com/en/germany-to-force-facebook-twitter-to-delete-hate-speech/a-37927085
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            This question is ignored because law makers don't understand AMP. But Google has increased responsibility from indexing to hosting...
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              ... Surely this puts increased legal responsibility on Google?


Search tweets' text