-
What is Google's legal responsibility towards the hosting of content through AMP?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
Because here's the thing: Facebook Instant Articles are only accessible through the app, but AMP is on the general web.On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
That means that Google is acting like a web host, but a very particular type, one enacting significant content restrictions, tho tech onesPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
I ask this for a reason, you see. What responsibility does Google have when hosting Fake News? Do we consider it a web host?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁
-
Could we, should we, exert economic pressure on Google for essentially amplifying Breitbart? (in the style of slpng_giants )?Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -1 🙁
-
We all agreed that this was both bad and in their control gizmodo.com/google-wont-alter-the-holocaust-denying-results-for-di-1790025043 so why isn't this use of AMP?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
If Facebook is going to be required to remove hate speech by countries, shouldn't same restrictions apply to AMP? m.dw.com/en/germany-to-force-facebook-twitter-to-delete-hate-speech/a-37927085Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood -3 🙁
-
This question is ignored because law makers don't understand AMP. But Google has increased responsibility from indexing to hosting...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
... Surely this puts increased legal responsibility on Google?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂