-
I don't know. Is it better or worse that Facebook isn't paying a bunch of journalistic organizations for their journalistic fact checking?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
I feel like this is a rules of economics question. Facebook is increasing the supply but not the value... t/f the value of facts goes down?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
This reminds me of {that thing with gamers & journalists} where shitty critics claimed: getting paid intrinsically compromised journalists.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -5 🙁
-
That's where this is right? I mean that's what Facebook is saying here: the work that fact checkers do is compromised if they get paid?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
This is what people with the whole 'Facebook should have editors' argued for. News orgs doing more work for no extra money.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
Economics note: More product, same total revenue for product = product is worth less. Congrats, now Facebook REALLY IS devaluing journalism.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +4 🙂
-
Soooo Facebook agrees with Gamer[you know] that Journalism is intrinsically compromised by getting paid?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
Because I have some STRONG THOUGHTS on that. Mainly that it is WRONG.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Giving away product for free on a new transmission platform w/no thought to how it compromises the business model? Chronotope/755902268436733953Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood 0
-
Enjoy figuring out your mistake 20 years from now *again*, if the planet isn't a burning husk by then.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
The media industry...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Permalink
On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Gah. This just gets more right daily. niemanlab.org/2016/12/the-people-running-the-media-are-the-problem/Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
...On twitter.com
Mood 0