Chronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 72,708

I don't know. Is it better or worse that Facebook isn't paying a bunch of journalistic organizations for their journalistic fact checking?
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 3 Favorites 2016 Dec 15 Mood -1 🙁

…in reply to @Chronotope
I feel like this is a rules of economics question. Facebook is increasing the supply but not the value... t/f the value of facts goes down?
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
This reminds me of {that thing with gamers & journalists} where shitty critics claimed: getting paid intrinsically compromised journalists.
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 Dec 15 Mood -5 🙁

…in reply to @Chronotope
That's where this is right? I mean that's what Facebook is saying here: the work that fact checkers do is compromised if they get paid?
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood 0

…in reply to @Chronotope
This is what people with the whole 'Facebook should have editors' argued for. News orgs doing more work for no extra money.
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood -1 🙁

…in reply to @Chronotope
Economics note: More product, same total revenue for product = product is worth less. Congrats, now Facebook REALLY IS devaluing journalism.
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood +4 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
Soooo Facebook agrees with Gamer[you know] that Journalism is intrinsically compromised by getting paid?
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
Because I have some STRONG THOUGHTS on that. Mainly that it is WRONG.
Permalink On twitter.com 2016 Dec 15 Mood 0

…in reply to @Chronotope
Giving away product for free on a new transmission platform w/no thought to how it compromises the business model? Chronotope/755902268436733953
On twitter.com ❤️ 3 Favorites 2016 Dec 15 Mood 0

Search tweets' text