Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 72,706

              1. I don't know. Is it better or worse that Facebook isn't paying a bunch of journalistic organizations for their journalistic fact checking?
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              I feel like this is a rules of economics question. Facebook is increasing the supply but not the value... t/f the value of facts goes down?
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            This reminds me of {that thing with gamers & journalists} where shitty critics claimed: getting paid intrinsically compromised journalists.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          That's where this is right? I mean that's what Facebook is saying here: the work that fact checkers do is compromised if they get paid?
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        This is what people with the whole 'Facebook should have editors' argued for. News orgs doing more work for no extra money.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Economics note: More product, same total revenue for product = product is worth less. Congrats, now Facebook REALLY IS devaluing journalism.
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    Soooo Facebook agrees with Gamer[you know] that Journalism is intrinsically compromised by getting paid?
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Because I have some STRONG THOUGHTS on that. Mainly that it is WRONG.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Giving away product for free on a new transmission platform w/no thought to how it compromises the business model? Chronotope/755902268436733953
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          Enjoy figuring out your mistake 20 years from now *again*, if the planet isn't a burning husk by then.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            The media industry...
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      ...


Search tweets' text