Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 70,338

                          1. Reading RiRi Williams / Iron Man controversy & extra discomfort: pieces that criticize (rightfully) the cover but use it as a featured img.
                        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                          Of course, image is vital to the discussion inside most pieces, but isn't using an image you disagree w/as ad on social repeating the sin?
                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                        Like: I agree w/everything in this article, but to share it with you is it repeating original sin under discussion? hitfix.com/harpy/an-iron-man-cover-is-the-latest-example-of-why-pinup-artists-shouldnt-draw-teenagers
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      Marvel is 100% shitty for trying to make money off this img but by making it the share image of a monetized article, you just did the same?
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    I feel like we need to have a real discussion about the ethics of social shares as their own pieces of content in general.
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  This is even worse in cases where the social share image ends up being a beheading or dead on the streets, which has happened in the past.
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                Sometimes it is b/c we don't think about what it is we're doing, & other times because we do and we're not considering the ethical component
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              Diluting discussions of share cards to 'is it clickbait?' misses so many points. The problem is not just how purposeful we're being, but why
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            This shit matters, and not just because it gets people to read your article, but because it lives in an independent context in social sites.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          Some people may never see more of your article than the share card & may interact and reshare it anyway. It doesn't have to just capture...
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        ... your share card has to stand up to the same ethics of journalism and your internal standards that your article does.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      We really need to think about this in public and really need to be more purposeful in our implementations.
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    PS: You know where else this really bothers me? Photos of victims of sexual assault used as featured images/share card images.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      It doesn't matter if the victim has made the decision to be public and given you her photo... still, this is bad ethics on sites' part


Search tweets' text