-
This project doesn't use semicolons, b/c overly formalize functions, css names and file structures but don't bother with formal line endingsPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
Seriously, do you ever get the feeling 90% of the javascript community styles projects b/c they like just heard an idea from a guy once?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
Please explain to me how building and using entire packages on formal typing but not doing formal line endings makes sense?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
This is the shit I'm talking about... do you think someone is just sitting out there thinking up ways to make javascript less clear?Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -3 🙁
-
Some people must be sitting out there saying to themselves 'no one will respect javascript because it isn't arcane enough, let's fix that'Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
Seriously, you know where this ends, everyone using anything but javascript to write javascript. Write it with Go! github.com/bep/grPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
Or write Javascript with oCaml github.com/bloomberg/bucklescript ! Because people can't tell what the best practice way to write actual JS isPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +3 🙂
-
Seriously, tho, I can't even find two React/Redux projects that look marginally similar. Sometimes being verbose in your code is useful...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
... because verbose code explains itself and its standards and makes it clear what those standards are. And we're compressing this anyway!Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
I dunno, mby I'm being grumpy because I used to be able to type an input field w/html and now it takes 8 libraries and 3 files.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
I get it is about prepping to scale up, and I love React and the idea of Flux & company etc... etc... but surely there is some better way?Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
Mood +5 🙂
-
I really should port my projects to TypeScript, which at least expresses types formally, but damn, just another thing to add to the stack.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
I think the worst offense in all this is that JavaScript was never a particularly DRY language, but it seems to be getting even less so.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -5 🙁
-
Look, we all have auto complete. Doing something like makingOn twitter.com
.bindless verbose with fat arrows isn't any more DRY than doing it verbosely
Mood +2 🙂
-
Javascript is now, in practice, always going to have a build task. So dropping characters from typed code is fundamentally pointless.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
I know, *I know*, that we're still in the process of fundamentally reinventing JS, that this is all transient and unfinished, but still.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0