Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 69,765

            1. …in reply to @undefined
              DuaneKinsey Not always. Many terrible ads enter our sites through legitimate ad exchanges with no controls over fraudulent buyers.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            DuaneKinsey And we have no control over what wins that bid, or what it could pull along with it. Even more so with VPAID ads.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          DuaneKinsey The problem cannot be solved by publishers. The networks have to be fixed, the buyers have to use different methods, and ...
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        DuaneKinsey ... the incentives *have* to be changed. Publishers are put in positions where they have neither control nor a choice.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      DuaneKinsey It is near impossible in the current structure of the ecosystem for publishers to assure quality - themarysue.com/ios-android-app-redirects/
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    DuaneKinsey If the NYT & BBC can't stop it, how can punishing small pubs, w/o tech knowledge to understand, help? theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/16/major-sites-new-york-times-bbc-ransomware-malvertising
    OpenGraph image for theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/16/major-sites-new-york-times-bbc-ransomware-malvertising


Search tweets' text