Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 69,761

    1. …in reply to @undefined
      DuaneKinsey Not always. Many terrible ads enter our sites through legitimate ad exchanges with no controls over fraudulent buyers.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -8 🙁
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    DuaneKinsey And we have no control over what wins that bid, or what it could pull along with it. Even more so with VPAID ads.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +3 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      DuaneKinsey The problem cannot be solved by publishers. The networks have to be fixed, the buyers have to use different methods, and ...
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        DuaneKinsey ... the incentives *have* to be changed. Publishers are put in positions where they have neither control nor a choice.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          DuaneKinsey It is near impossible in the current structure of the ecosystem for publishers to assure quality - themarysue.com/ios-android-app-redirects/
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +2 🙂
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            DuaneKinsey If the NYT & BBC can't stop it, how can punishing small pubs, w/o tech knowledge to understand, help? theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/16/major-sites-new-york-times-bbc-ransomware-malvertising
            OpenGraph image for theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/16/major-sites-new-york-times-bbc-ransomware-malvertising
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +1 🙂

Search tweets' text