-
hahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahaa NiemanLab/766009487744303104Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 2 Retweets
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
SOME FUN NOTES: - Open Source doesn't mean open web - Open Source doesn't mean good - Open Source doesn't mean adheres to standardsPermalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +7 🙂
-
- Open Source doesn't mean 'everyone is involved' - Open Source is not, in and of itself, an ecosystem. - Control is not qualityPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
Also: “It’s not Google vs. Facebook. It’s Google trying to maintain the health of the open web so that it can compete with Facebook." is BSPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
You don't get to propose, lead & aggressively push by altering search pages a project that demolishes HTML standards and call it 'open web'Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
I'd have less of a problem w/AMP is Google didn't go on and on and on about how it is 'open web'. Every time they say it I trust them less.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
And yet again: If the top 5 contributors to an Open Source project are Google then it is a freaking Google project github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributorsPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
If the engineers who close the pull requests are mostly Google then it is a Google project github.com/orgs/ampproject/peoplePermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood 0
-
The fact journalists keep allowing Google to get away with this double-speak bullshit shield of "the code is out there" reflects ignorance.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -6 🙁
-
I'm not doubting that other orgs contribute to AMP, but it isn't their project. It is a Google project and Google runs it. End of story.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
mathewi Literally half of what Gingras had quoted in that article was easily disprovable bullshit. I like your stuff, but come on.On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁