Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 66,981

                        1. hahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahaa NiemanLab/766009487744303104
                          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                        SOME FUN NOTES: - Open Source doesn't mean open web - Open Source doesn't mean good - Open Source doesn't mean adheres to standards
                        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +7 🙂
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      - Open Source doesn't mean 'everyone is involved' - Open Source is not, in and of itself, an ecosystem. - Control is not quality
                      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    Also: “It’s not Google vs. Facebook. It’s Google trying to maintain the health of the open web so that it can compete with Facebook." is BS
                    Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  You don't get to propose, lead & aggressively push by altering search pages a project that demolishes HTML standards and call it 'open web'
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                I'd have less of a problem w/AMP is Google didn't go on and on and on about how it is 'open web'. Every time they say it I trust them less.
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              And yet again: If the top 5 contributors to an Open Source project are Google then it is a freaking Google project github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
              OpenGraph image for github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            If the engineers who close the pull requests are mostly Google then it is a Google project github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
            OpenGraph image for github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          The fact journalists keep allowing Google to get away with this double-speak bullshit shield of "the code is out there" reflects ignorance.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -6 🙁
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        I'm not doubting that other orgs contribute to AMP, but it isn't their project. It is a Google project and Google runs it. End of story.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +1 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Last note here: If AMP was helping publishers it would be getting them paid at parity, like FB IA is doing for most. It isn't doing that...
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    So what AMP does is help Google and basically only help Google.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +4 🙂

Search tweets' text