Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 66,979

                    1. hahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahaa NiemanLab/766009487744303104
                      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    SOME FUN NOTES: - Open Source doesn't mean open web - Open Source doesn't mean good - Open Source doesn't mean adheres to standards
                    Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +7 🙂
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  - Open Source doesn't mean 'everyone is involved' - Open Source is not, in and of itself, an ecosystem. - Control is not quality
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                Also: “It’s not Google vs. Facebook. It’s Google trying to maintain the health of the open web so that it can compete with Facebook." is BS
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              You don't get to propose, lead & aggressively push by altering search pages a project that demolishes HTML standards and call it 'open web'
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            I'd have less of a problem w/AMP is Google didn't go on and on and on about how it is 'open web'. Every time they say it I trust them less.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          And yet again: If the top 5 contributors to an Open Source project are Google then it is a freaking Google project github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
          OpenGraph image for github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        If the engineers who close the pull requests are mostly Google then it is a Google project github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
        OpenGraph image for github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      The fact journalists keep allowing Google to get away with this double-speak bullshit shield of "the code is out there" reflects ignorance.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -6 🙁
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    I'm not doubting that other orgs contribute to AMP, but it isn't their project. It is a Google project and Google runs it. End of story.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +1 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      mathewi Literally half of what Gingras had quoted in that article was easily disprovable bullshit. I like your stuff, but come on.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
    2. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Last note here: If AMP was helping publishers it would be getting them paid at parity, like FB IA is doing for most. It isn't doing that...
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        So what AMP does is help Google and basically only help Google.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +4 🙂

Search tweets' text