Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 66,972

      1. hahahahahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhahahahaa NiemanLab/766009487744303104
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      SOME FUN NOTES: - Open Source doesn't mean open web - Open Source doesn't mean good - Open Source doesn't mean adheres to standards
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    - Open Source doesn't mean 'everyone is involved' - Open Source is not, in and of itself, an ecosystem. - Control is not quality
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Also: “It’s not Google vs. Facebook. It’s Google trying to maintain the health of the open web so that it can compete with Facebook." is BS
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        You don't get to propose, lead & aggressively push by altering search pages a project that demolishes HTML standards and call it 'open web'
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          I'd have less of a problem w/AMP is Google didn't go on and on and on about how it is 'open web'. Every time they say it I trust them less.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            And yet again: If the top 5 contributors to an Open Source project are Google then it is a freaking Google project github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
            OpenGraph image for github.com/ampproject/amphtml/graphs/contributors
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              If the engineers who close the pull requests are mostly Google then it is a Google project github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
              OpenGraph image for github.com/orgs/ampproject/people
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                The fact journalists keep allowing Google to get away with this double-speak bullshit shield of "the code is out there" reflects ignorance.
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  I'm not doubting that other orgs contribute to AMP, but it isn't their project. It is a Google project and Google runs it. End of story.
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    mathewi Literally half of what Gingras had quoted in that article was easily disprovable bullshit. I like your stuff, but come on.
                  2. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    Last note here: If AMP was helping publishers it would be getting them paid at parity, like FB IA is doing for most. It isn't doing that...
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      So what AMP does is help Google and basically only help Google.


Search tweets' text