Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 64,950

                    1. One presumes if you are presented w/a newsletter sign-up, the site expects you would sign up, right? So I did. To every prompt. For months.
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    Last week was the first where I stopped signing up for *everything*. So what do I get now?
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  1 week of newsletters brings me 1,159 individual emails, sent via the sites I normally read on a regular basis.
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                113 emails are from The New York Times. 210 are from WaPo. 45 are from Seeking Alpha. 3 are from Mic. 10 from Gothamist. 69 from Politico.
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              25 are weekday ones from various Gawker properties. A number of other sets of 5 from various weekdays.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            Gawker properties together, WaPo, and Politico cluster-send, which looks a little like this:
            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          Some random off-the-cuff reflections.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Those who send the most seem to also have longest subject lines. WaPo has 14 emails in Jun 27 3pm cluster. 50% cut off their subject lines.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      5 out of 11 the next day do the same.
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    10 emails exceed 300kb. 29 larger than 200kb. 250 larger than 100kb. 792 lager than 50kb. 13 smaller than 10kb.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      72 emails in that week include the word "Morning" in the title. 16 include "Evening". 1 includes "Afternoon". 24 include "Day"
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Chronotope 26 include the word "Breaking" in the subject.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          The total reading level of a page of 100 emails during this week hovers around grade 12. For whatever that's worth.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            Scanning these now, I see mby 1 out of 20 that actually look like things I'd like to open. Some have incredibly generic subjects.
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              Some seem to be set up as appointment media. Like they expect someone to show up to their inbox looking for this week's issue.
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                96 subjects with "Today" in them. Usually "Today's" or "Today:". 28 emails use "week" in subject. 14 use "This week".
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  66 email newsletters have "Trump" in the subject. 17 have "Hillary". 43 have "Clinton".
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    This was the week of the big Supreme Court abortion law decision. 91 newsletters mention the words "Abortion" AND "law".
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      The Brexit was the week before. 378 newsletters mention "Brexit". Trump's Star of David incident was that weekend. 8 newsletters mention it.
                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                        Bit.ly is occasionally used in Politico's Morning Score newsletter. The first 4 in the email of the 28th is in about the middle. Let's peak
                        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                            Interestingly, of all those clicks only 47 out of 404 were clicked after the day the newsletter was sent.
                            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                              Fun extra interesting fact: only about 10% of all the newsletters I received that week actually wrote out URLs in the body of the email.
                              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                & those are some random email newsletter observations for the evening. Prompt some good questions to do real analysis on. Now to play w/API!


Search tweets' text