Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 61,961

        1. We should make a fun list. A gray/black-hat publisher list. And then we should see how many have ad units linking to legit publishers.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        I'll start us off! (Special note: I will try to avoid making these links, if I mistakenly do so, DO NOT CLICK ON THEM).
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Black/Gray Hat Publishers: diply . com thelisticles . net linkbeef . com buzzit . club imgism . com 98pix . com theboredmind . com ...
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    Black/Grat Hat Publishers: cars-space . com vowgag . com gaghut . com fullfunn . com viralgsp . com buzzmad . com note . taable . com ...
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Here's a blackhat publisher, not even bothering to try removing the watermarks from what appear to be stolen Verge articles: ngabota . com
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Black/Gray Hat Publishers: a . brobbro . com (a site which used to be at fun . broviral . com, but mysteriously disappeared ) funkypie . com
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          To be clear, it is hard to prove someone is a blackhat publisher but these sure look like it based on ripped content and monetization.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            But for fun, Google the headline on any article on these and see how many other exact duplicates come up. A bunch, if not pages, of them.
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              And if any of these sites get blacklisted (like broviral . com did), they just shut it down, buy a new domain and pop the database back in.
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                There's the entire SocialHolic network, which appears to be, at best, working in bad faith w/advertisers by just running duplicative content
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  Black/Gray-hat publishers: viralvinny . com boredomtherapy . com thebrofessional . net guiltyfix . com
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    If you ever wanted to know who populates shitty stories into the bottom of your favorite sites, here's a good place to start ^
                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                      Here's one of those sites getting auto-placed units from Forbes and Answers.
                      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                        This charming ad for Yahoo Search is on an article titled "Female Logic Doesn't Always Make Sense"
                        oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                          Here's a wonderful piece of "content", don't worry, Criteo's machine learning is assuring good ad placements.
                          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                            Here's a Motley Fool ad next to a video of children fighting. But don't worry... one of them has kickboxing training
                            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                              Just click through one of those bottom page ads and google a headline on that site and look, a rich vein of crap.
                              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                Black/Gray Hat Publisher: uberhavoc . com sharedable . com buzzamin . com ozar . com poplyft . com
                                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                  Don't believe viewability is a bullshit metric? The sticky footer ad here is "viewable". Hey, 50% visible! lol.
                                  oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                    My favorite trick for tracking fraudsters is when their site sends you traffic that is 10x their estimated userbase on Compete.
                                    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                      But you gotta be on your toes, most legit publishers don't have the expertise or time.
                                      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                        And the other half of the problem is when it comes to adapting to "legitimizing" metrics, fraudsters are faster implementers than we are.
                                        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                          Here's a nice article 'preschool is evil' on trash site RebelCircus. Ads shown include The Daily Dot & Bustle.
                                          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                                            Ask yourself: does it not just damage the brand but the entire legitimacy of a publisher when they appear in these contexts?
              2. …in reply to @Chronotope
                Feel free to add more to this list.
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  Accidentally broke this chain, continues at: Chronotope/735605725351796737


Search tweets' text