Chronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 61,046

I mean yes, for sure, this is a great idea, but whew, the reality of implementation is exhausting to consider. buff.ly/26PXL4A
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2016 May 3 Mood +4 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
I mean, for one, Do Not Track advocates can't even agree on what exactly respecting Do Not Track entails.
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 May 3 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
As a result, Hulu (using profcarroll's example) can have its site respect Do Not Track, but allow partners to. dropbox.com/s/l2i2phlzo1gtevq/Screenshot%202016-05-03%2014.14.37.png?dl=0
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 May 3 Mood +3 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
And Medium 'respects' DNT better then most (though Twitter Syndicated ads still appear to be tracking me dropbox.com/s/jvc3fp48d88ocdk/Screenshot%202016-05-03%2014.16.26.png?dl=0 ) ...
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 May 3 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
But that's because their model isn't about the type of tracking you normally think about. You interact with Medium, those interactions...
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 May 3 Mood 0

…in reply to @Chronotope
Medium's interactions are used to create a customized response based on your user activity. Even if only based on Likes, is that "Tracking"?
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 1 Favorite 2016 May 3 Mood +2 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
I need to write something longer about this, but basically DNT is a nice theory with terrible implementation at every level.
On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2016 May 3 Mood 0

Search tweets' text