Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 57,350

              1. Postmortems of journalism organizations still mostly refuse to discuss how money made an impact. Annoying.
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              Sorry, I just can't believe that 90% of journalism orgs are killed by 'cultural problems', as would seem to be indicated by media journos.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            Seriously, our industry is basically coming apart at the budget-lines and we still can't have a serious talk about The Money?
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          I mean... WTF is this? espn.go.com/blog/ombudsman/post/_/id/604/looking-back-at-grantland-espn-decision-sad-not-necessarily-wrong 3,000 words about Grantland to conclude that it was all on one EIC's culture-building?
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        If Grantland had been built, run, and made a profit like an actual business, than Simmons' departure wouldn't have meant squat.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      The reason editors had a loyalty to Simmons is because if you're not making money then the only thing you've got is loyalty. Soooooo?
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    I mean, I'm not particularly surprised, considering the author, that there is no interest here in analyzing the money side. ...
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      But still, this is disappointing as the first major article by ESPN's Public Editor. And generally as an analysis.
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        At this point if you're doing a postmortem of a journalism organization and not talking about the money, you're not doing it right.


Search tweets' text