-
The slow but sure change wrought by the internet: history is no longer being written by the victors, but by the people most able to organizePermalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it means that we have to be even more careful than before about what the truth is.On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
Also, if there was any doubt, in retrospect it means that 'community organizer' is really the most qualifying position for President.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
I think we may be nearing a point where command over communities is nearly as effective a tool for writing history as command of arms.Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
Mood +2 🙂
-
In the future, we may see this period not as liberalism vs conservatism, but force of communal thought vs force of arms as a decision maker.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
This is why Freedom of Speech, Freedom to Bear Arms and militarized government vs communities, have become our prime topics.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +4 🙂
-
People fear community rule over the potential force of the individual. And they fear how communities that rise to rule discourse are definedPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -3 🙁
-
In a very real way, we're fighting a war over the comment section because we think that whoever wins writes the past and the future.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
And that has little to do with political allegiance, which is why stuff can get real mixed up when we talk about how bad communities 'align'Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -3 🙁
-
"Who gets to rule our discourse?" is a defining question more effective than what party you subscribe to. "Why?" is the one we need to ask.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
The reason?: For the first time in history, the answer to 'who rules our discourse' could be anyone. Doesn't make it democratic, just is.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0