Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 39,323

      1. …in reply to @alexromano
        alexromano That's not the point. Buildings get big benefits for inclusionary housing. The extra units they get to sell by pay for it.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +2 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      alexromano Really, just one of those extra units that a buildings gets to sell prob. pays for a doorman's salary. That's the point...
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    alexromano ... that inclusionary housing balances payoff for buildings with the lost profit, basically poor doors are like charging twice.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      alexromano In that: the extra costs incurred are already paid for through breaks given by the city. So they're just using this as an excuse
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁

Search tweets' text