Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 37,829

      1. …in reply to @nickisnixed
        nickisnixed jedpressfate I've actually been thinking about this a lot, is it a conflict on interest? It really depends on the situation...
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      nickisnixed jedpressfate The big problem is that the indie community and the AAA community both deal in shared distribution platforms.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood 0
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    nickisnixed jedpressfate If you were to publish a book with Tor, it would be unethical IMO to review some other Tor book. But...
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood -2 🙁
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      nickisnixed jedpressfate ... all games distribute through Steam pretty much. It gives incentive to promote, which could be an ethics issue
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood +2 🙂
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Chronotope jedpressfate JMan240 The big issue is you don't want a revolving door of dev-to-journ-to-dev high-five-ing each other.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed There's clearly some ethical concerns with dev/journos. The game industry is perhaps unique in this...
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +3 🙂
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed ... because, IMO, more reviewers have an interest in making games than in other media criticism.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
            1. …in reply to @Chronotope
              jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed Far bigger issues: both press junkets & gifts are considered unethical, but mainstay of games journalism
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood -2 🙁
              1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed The other half of the question is that critics are generally forbidden from being involved in PR tasks.
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -4 🙁
              2. …in reply to @Chronotope
                jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed But every indie dev does own PR. Would indie film makers fall under Article 5:3? fipresci.org/about/statutes.htm
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood 0
                1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                  jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed Article 6:4 of Film Critics' Fed. bans critics who recently worked in-industry: fipresci.org/about/statutes.htm
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
                  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
                    jedpressfate JMan240 nickisnixed Also consider SPJ's rules - spj.org/ethicscode.asp - "Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived."
                    Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood -2 🙁

Search tweets' text