Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 156,685

  1. This is a very dumb conclusion for a number of reasons, but step back for a moment and think about the author... WTF sort of person *knows* that X will destroy humanity and decides to spend their life working on it anyway? vice.com/en/article/93aqep/google-deepmind-researcher-co-authors-paper-saying-ai-will-eliminate-humanity
    OpenGraph image for vice.com/en/article/93aqep/google-deepmind-researcher-co-authors-paper-saying-ai-will-eliminate-humanity
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      If this is your conclusion and you keep working for one of the largest AI projects in the world anyway, it's sort of telling me that your personal ethics are nil right?
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Hard to believe that Google fired the person with ethics of bias objections to AI but retains the engineer who, based on his own conclusions, is willing to work towards ending all human life.
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          Anyway, there's no reason AI would have or choose to act like humans and concluding it would compete with us for resources is real silly. It doesn't need most of the resources we do and if we're really afraid of it guzzling all the oil or something like that... renewables exist.
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            And even getting to that point is an undeniable huge leap.


Search tweets' text