-
AugmentedRyan This is a very silly comparison when considering the actual impacts of those things vs crypto and also, people using those things get immediate life benefits, crypto just moves money around and is not nearly as necessary context.center/topics/cryptocurrency/#bad-for-the-environmentOn twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
AugmentedRyan If you're interested in understanding why we need to shut things down and how it can be accomplished, I've linked one useful peer-reviewed paper already and I recommend this book: versobooks.com/books/3665-how-to-blow-up-a-pipelinePermalink On twitter.com
Mood +8 🙂
-
AugmentedRyan I'll also note that, unaddressed in your various links, is the extremely high cost of heavy-working electronics and their inevitable contribution to e-waste. Here's a good source for that (from a peer reviewed journal) - sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344921005103Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
AugmentedRyan I would love to be wrong, but thus far I've linked peer reviewed articles, mainstream news sources, & my own *quite long* assembled set of links of research on this topic. You've managed to link a bunch of not-peer-reviewed pro-crypto publications. Anything else?Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
AugmentedRyan While the real changes to save us from--once again I reiterate--literal extinction have to happen at a systematic level there are opportunities to educate people re:high impact behaviors... like Christmas lights. More: melmagazine.com/en-us/story/ranking-christmas-decorations-by-how-terrible-they-are-for-the-environment bbc.com/news/science-environment-54087176Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +6 🙂
-
AugmentedRyan There is a really great discussion about how individual changes can drive larger changes here - proquest.com/docview/1537389035 with the PDF freely available in its pre-published version here: centaur.reading.ac.uk/40495/3/MCKINNONdespair%20CENTAUR.pdfPermalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂