-
pbannist sabotosh humanpropensity luk_wlodarczyk SimonJHarris KyleDozeman I think it really depends on your philosophical framing! Not in the panopticon sense, if it is not visible to participants than in theory you are not surveilled. In this sense FLEDGE could conceivable accomplish the goals of targeted advertising without "surveillance"...On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
pbannist sabotosh humanpropensity luk_wlodarczyk SimonJHarris KyleDozeman But the surveillance capitalism frame posits that the means by which you are targeted is dependent on unfairly harvesting a user's labor, which generates the data on the basis of which targeting happens, without compensating or consulting them...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
pbannist sabotosh humanpropensity luk_wlodarczyk SimonJHarris KyleDozeman In this case the use of the data is the surveillance, and it's use in targeting is an attack on the user's economic value, in a way basically robbing them of the fruit of their own labor. FLEDGE nor Topics solves for this case. There is no user-based targeting solution that couldPermalink On twitter.com
Mood 0