-
jarroddicker You mean something like cgccomics.com/grading/grading-scale/ but for digital objects? Like the idea that digital objects will always be in "mint" condition?On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +4 🙂
-
jarroddicker Perhaps a reasonable analogue might be "hosting and access costs" since so many digital objects are hosted centrally, even if the records of those trades are not. Maintaining a digital value accrues cost that way, which can then be rolled into an understanding of its value.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
jarroddicker So running with CGC metaphor for digital objects, perhaps one might rate digital object "mint"-ness on ease of accessibility. If the owner has a seedbox hosting and seeding their own object and transaction record, along with an accessible server with high uptime that is "mint"...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
jarroddicker If owner also owns a server with a high uptime, but isn't seeding a decentralized torrent of their object, or that object doesn't have a lot of seeders, that's "near mint". Whereas an owner who relies on a central server run by a 3rd party might be rated lower, and so on.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
jarroddicker You could easily see this system applied to add hosting reliability to a rating. So if I'm hosting it somewhere sketch whose website could go down, it adds nothing to the score, but if my digital good is displayed using a high uptime zero cost public Github site, big bonus.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +6 🙂