-
This is a *really* bad share card because the image text "can a nice guy be an effective leader?" is entirely irrelevant to the story, unsupported by the article and implies you have to be cruel to lead a company which is gross and bullshit and not even what the story is about...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 16 Favorites
Mood -8 🙁
-
One's mind automatically jumps to Betteridge's law, & that's bad enough, but because the article takes the position (by amplifying only his detractors) Pichai is a bad leader, it implies--been though the image is not in the story--that nice can't lead. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines#:~:text=Betteridge's%20law%20of%20headlines%20is,the%20principle%20is%20much%20older.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood -3 🙁
-
This assumption is regressive, like something out of Mad Men. And the share card is especially dumb because the problem people state they have with Pichai is that: 1. He takes too long to make decisions. 2. He hasn't aggressively quashed labor and ethics complaints internally.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood -7 🙁
-
And it also blames staff departures on him... instead of on what the real cause likely was: 'don't be evil' Google becoming an embarrassing villain in the press and in political circles... For very good reasons!Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -1 🙁
-
So apparently you can't run a company if you're unwilling to bring in the Pinkertons to quash labor organization I guess? It's a meh article to begin with for these reasons, but that share card just is so unnecessary and bad.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -2 🙁
-
I'm assuming someone realized that, because the image is not in the story itself, but they forgot to remove the share card!On twitter.com
Mood 0