-
One's mind automatically jumps to Betteridge's law, & that's bad enough, but because the article takes the position (by amplifying only his detractors) Pichai is a bad leader, it implies--been though the image is not in the story--that nice can't lead. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines#:~:text=Betteridge's%20law%20of%20headlines%20is,the%20principle%20is%20much%20older.
-
*even though
-
This assumption is regressive, like something out of Mad Men. And the share card is especially dumb because the problem people state they have with Pichai is that: 1. He takes too long to make decisions. 2. He hasn't aggressively quashed labor and ethics complaints internally.
-
And it also blames staff departures on him... instead of on what the real cause likely was: 'don't be evil' Google becoming an embarrassing villain in the press and in political circles... For very good reasons!
-
So apparently you can't run a company if you're unwilling to bring in the Pinkertons to quash labor organization I guess? It's a meh article to begin with for these reasons, but that share card just is so unnecessary and bad.
-
I'm assuming someone realized that, because the image is not in the story itself, but they forgot to remove the share card!