Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 127,690

  1. Companies are spinning this like an added fee to annoy consumers, but it really should have been in the cost of their service from day one. Think of it this way: you're not paying a fee, you're paying the actual cost of the labor, instead of one subsidized by exploitation johnmyers/1343746527844466689
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Positioning it this way, as some additional fee that is burdening the service recipient, is both misleading and offensive. What other product or service breaks out 'cost of providing basic employment benefits' on your receipt?


Search tweets' text