-
oh no what if the arbitrary standard that editors must be assholes, one disproven by many excellent editors who are nice people, and rejected by a full generation who didn't see the bullying lead to three hour media lunches and big money, backfired on the assholesPermalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 15 Favorites
Mood +3 🙂
-
oh no did it turn out that being a structurally abusive manager magnifies inequality in your organization so that even if you aren't actively going around racist and marching with nazis the values of 'bucking the norm' and ego functionally turn you into a racistPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 9 Favorites
Mood -10 🙁
-
Decades of leadership via shitty humanity leading to inequality is unfixable via "a desperate grasp for relevance". That we are even framing the idea that a woman past retirement age retire with her millions instead of hanging on as some sort of big question shows pro-system biasPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -3 🙁
-
All headlines framed as questions tend to have the same answer, according to Betteridge's law: no. nytimes.com/2020/06/11/nyregion/anna-wintour-conde-nast-racism.html#click=https://t.co/IM9i11yhTpOn twitter.com
❤️ 5 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁