Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 119,505

  1. …in reply to @Matt_Kiser
    Matt_Kiser I mean, you can Google any text and *I* didn't put the side eyes in the header, that was what was on the platform. Besides, my detailed critiques elsewhere are public, this is just frustration at one note BS. And not every complaint is an invitation to engage in discussion.
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Matt_Kiser I have a hard time taking seriously enough to write an in-depth critique of anyone who justifies their stance with Classical Texts. Why engage in serious conversation with someone who is does not speak in a way that invites serious feedback?
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Matt_Kiser I've often--& gladly--engaged directly w/the people I disagree with, but what is the conversation I'm supposed to have (assuming I was given a response)? None of the core claims are backed w/any cited research or sources. It's not an interesting discussion to have on that basis.


Search tweets' text