Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 117,054

    1. The IAB is fooling themselves if they think this permanent ID for the web is going to happen. It's a proposal so stuck in the past they'd have better luck trying to build a time machine. johnwilander/1227306368954228736
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 9 Retweets ❤️ 56 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    It would be laughable if they weren't about to 'lead' my industry off a cliff.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 10 Favorites Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Even if the proposal was feasible (it is not) it would not benefit publishers, and also it's just gross. Like dirty, bad intent, down in the mud desperate gross.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 16 Favorites Mood -12 🙁
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        If I wrote that specification I wouldn't be able to sleep at night.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 11 Favorites Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          poynter.org/tech-tools/2016/ad-tech-is-broken-heres-how-newsrooms-can-fix-it/
          OpenGraph image for poynter.org/tech-tools/2016/ad-tech-is-broken-heres-how-newsrooms-can-fix-it/oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 12 Favorites Mood 0
          1. …in reply to @Chronotope
            The browsers won't stand for it, the regulators won't stand for it, and it is clearly a legal disaster in CA and the EU. Hard to see what they think is going to happen here.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 8 Favorites Mood -1 🙁

Search tweets' text