-
So... GDPR compatability finally? Or... Honestly wtf is this? If you need 5 videos to explain a feature then it is a bad feature. MetaNewsroom/1163829235858808832Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 8 Favorites
Mood -7 🙁
-
Meera's husband is all of us right now.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood 0
-
lol the music at the start of this video is Something.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +3 🙂
-
OMG I'm not sure who I feel worse for, this poor lady who has to explain the Facebook Pixel or her poor husband who has to act like he understands wtf is going on.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -9 🙁
-
Facebook Husband's obsession with watches is pretty alarming IMO.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
Ok, I've figured it out. I was right at top, this is GDPR-level transparency into who is using the Facebook Pixel to track you, so off-site businesses that are running the Facebook Pixel, now you can see who they are and potentially remove them.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood +2 🙂
-
I'm not sure that stops them from re-tagging you, makes it any clearer where they tagged you, etc... but it is perhaps the most Facebook has done to provide the type of GDPR-level controls they have previously stated they are not mandated to provide.Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 1 Retweets
❤️ 4 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
Also, looks like an opportunity for them to Once Again Note that Facebook doesn't actually give your data to Facebook Pixel users, it's just about storing the data that those sites send to the pixel. Which... ok.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +4 🙂
-
What I really want now is for Facebook Husband to explain the Facebook Pixel back to us.On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
Honestly I feel for this dude most of all. Facebook Husband is All Of Us whenever Facebook announces a new feature: 'Wait does this mean Facebook is giving my information to something bad?'Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 3 Favorites
Mood -3 🙁