Chronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 106,532

This is such a great piece, serious questions about authorship and attribution in the context of journalism's use of fixers are asked and should be considered deeply by western publications. PranavDixit/1145678512272969734
On twitter.com ♻️ 6 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites 2019 Jul 1 Mood +3 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
IMO: More transparency into what goes into creating a story is vital in rebuilding the trust between readers and media, sourcing, fixers, copy editors, editors, the time put in, the resources involved, etc... medium.com/@aramzs/authorship-value-and-the-medias-lost-profits-dabe7d1726c8
Permalink On twitter.com ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites 2019 Jul 1 Mood +1 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
Not only would this allow publications and readers to better understand the value positions like copy editors contribute to the bottom line, but it might help reconsider who gets to work where. In a more highly remote world, remote employment or work with freelancers, is valuable
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 5 Favorites 2019 Jul 1 Mood +7 🙂

…in reply to @Chronotope
Almost all of the blockers traditional organizations of any type have had against remote employment have faded. They can build different structures. Embracing the opportunities to widen their employee base & bring in a wider range of life experiences & outlooks is valuable stuff.
Permalink On twitter.com ❤️ 6 Favorites 2019 Jul 1 Mood +2 🙂

Search tweets' text