-
cwarzel Assuming the docs are honest and correct (one of them has a misspelling so *shrugz* who knows) the algorithmic bias stuff all looks like clear takes on accepted academic work, the idea that some 'conservative sources' might not overlap with truth checks out...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +5 🙂
-
cwarzel The editorial guidelines bit clearly indicates that they are checking the *news sites* for editorial guidelines, likely via the Schema-dot-org structures they've been recommending news orgs use for a while now (so they can be easily crawled)...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites
Mood +1 🙂
-
cwarzel The "single point of truth" question is a little unclear & worrying, but what I think it likely means, looking at the other docs, is the engineering term, instead of different news products pulling from different data sources there would be a single data source for Google News...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -4 🙁
-
cwarzel In engineering terminology moving the source of content from a variety of databases to the blue colored Corpus database would be what an engineer might call "having a single point of truth" for the source of content, like saying they are centralizing the database/APIs...Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +2 🙂
-
cwarzel So I doubt it's a single source of factual truth at play here, meaning source who leaked docs is likely non technical staff. Interesting to see they are integrating Twitter into news products somehow tho. The YouTube stuff is all things legit journalism about YT has discussed.On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood 0
-
cwarzel I suspect the editorial principles referred to in the doc are: schema.org/publishingPrinciplesPermalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
cwarzel In case you are curious, this is the technical definition of Single Source of Truth: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_source_of_truthPermalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂