Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 102,953

        1. These name trend pieces are always sort of silly, because when you consider the scale it gets ridiculous. Yes 2017 marked a year in which Khaleesi was in the top 1000 names, but that's only with 466 names, that's still a mere 0.025% of female births. ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi
          OpenGraph image for ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood -1 🙁
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        And Arya has long beat out Khaleesi, and been on the top 1000 list since 2010. At a rank of 135 in 2017, that is still a tiny .115% of names for a total of 2156 female babies. So this is pretty silly as a coverage topic nytimes.com/2019/04/29/style/game-of-thrones-baby-names.html
        OpenGraph image for nytimes.com/2019/04/29/style/game-of-thrones-baby-names.html
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +2 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      To put it to real scale here, there just aren't *that* many babies named the same thing the same year. The most popular female name is Emma, it has been for 2014-2017 now. It only represents 1.053% of births, a total of 19,738.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    (that's in 2017, if that wasn't clear)
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +1 🙂

Search tweets' text