-
jbenton All Twitter content is publically addressable. I think it is the mix of taking publically addressable content and using it to promote content that is not publically addressable that is most troubling. That's why the push back seems far more reasonable here than elsewhere.On twitter.com
❤️ 5 Favorites
Mood -1 🙁
-
jbenton I think adding ads to a tool makes more sense because the ads fund the creation of the tool. Selling subscription access to otherwise unavailable content is a very different question.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -1 🙁
-
jbenton Let me put it in another sense: Is it ok to use a Creative Commons Share Alike image inside a system which is inaccessible to public access? Is Share Alike a concept that applies only to content, or also to platforms that host that content?Permalink On twitter.com
♻️ 4 Retweets
❤️ 6 Favorites
Mood +4 🙂