-
What if blocking Luminary is a defensive action on behalf of the open web that we should have done to Facebook and maybe Google News but never did?
-
I mean, what if the undiscovered but essential principle of the open web is that it isn't interoperable with systems that want to monitize it without returning anything? Is it appropriate to say: "we're open to all platforms that act with reciprocal data to match our values?"
-
At a fundamental level, any system which consumes open urls, produces new, unrelated, content, but does not tie that content to publicly accessible urls, is weaponizing the open web against itself, right?