-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr Ok. You do that and we will continue the conversation after you come back with proof that you understand how publishers handle bots better then me. I will gladly listen/read such proof. I'm not afraid to be wrong here.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +2 🙂
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr But as far as I can tell, you are fundamentally misunderstanding how programmatic alters the way publishers can talk to advertisers or control advertising technology. There's a problem to be solved, but turning off all ads everywhere isn't going to solve it.On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr I can't argue from the supposition that ads shouldn't exist on publishers websites, because such an assumption dismisses the capital requirements involved unfairly. I'm looking for a solution that allows publishers to stay operating. That happens w/ads.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood +1 🙂
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr Even non-profits and sponsored publishers have ads and ad tech involved in their sites, even if it is less. Even sponsors want to know that their sponsorship is seen. There are operating requirements that exist as long as producing journalism costs money.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂