-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr Trying to solve the problem at the wrong place solves nothing. Publishers are doing plenty of work to solve this, but there's ~7,000 ad tech products out there with the majority of them functioning fraudulently.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -1 🙁
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr Everyone needs to do something, including publishers, but you are quite incorrect in identifying what the problem is or where its source is. Sure, eliminating all advertising on legit publishers would take a chunk out of ad fraud. But it wouldn't solve it...Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -5 🙁
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr Nor would it solve the core societal problem. This isn't an engineering tech debate. Publishers are vital to functioning democracies and unless we're eliminating capitalism they need to make money. Ad support is an essential component in that.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood +1 🙂
-
mikkokotila dmarti hakosam robleathern jason_kint acfou JudSpencer joemarchese sriramk Carnage4Life MikeIsaac jarroddicker kevinweil ryanvailbrown WebBarr If your debate topic is: "Eliminate capitalism to stop ad fraud" hey, I'm 100% with you there. Let's go start a revolution. But short of that, the issue will be solved by attacking the malicious actors, not acting judge-y towards the victims.On twitter.com
❤️ 1 Favorite
Mood -8 🙁