Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 96,083

    1. …in reply to @reconbot
      reconbot zigzagpod I mean any pot of money interested in funding small focused journalism startups could theoretically do a lot of good, but the organization, and the VC it received, seemed to be heavily predicated on establishing and promoting both the token and the blockchain in general.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +8 🙂
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    reconbot zigzagpod It seems to me if they couldn't raise enough money here via their chosen medium they would be fundamentally ineffective at maintaining and funding a foundation without it. How could they possibly be depended on to survive if they can't reach this relatively small level of buy-in.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood -3 🙁
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      reconbot zigzagpod 8 mil sounds like a lot, but they were right in one respect, as a seed amount for a foundation w/their stated aspirations it represents a bare minimum of runway. People and publishers had the chance to vote with their wallet on the viability of Civil, and it seems the vote is no
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +5 🙂
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        reconbot zigzagpod And that vote isn't just for the token, it's for the project and the foundation.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          reconbot zigzagpod And the incentives for more funding from VCs for them seem centered around another blockchain related play.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0

Search tweets' text