Chronotope’s avatarChronotope’s Twitter Archive—№ 93,899

    1. Ehhhhhhh. I don't think so. YouTube's consistently failed at live and so has Facebook, they've only started 'programming' recently. More like it's running the consumer cable TV play from... like ... the 60s? ShiraOvide/1029705365854642177
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
  1. …in reply to @Chronotope
    Facebook hasn't succeeded on live and YouTube hasn't been profitable. But TV made money in its day. A mix of pay to play, live and gated live programming? Custom packages of additional 'channels'?
    On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
    1. …in reply to @Chronotope
      Yeah, I think Amazon's video aspirations are not YouTube or Facebook, but to be your cable provider in a wire-cutter world. Makes more sense, who would want to emulate two strategies that led to years of failure?
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar Mood 0
      1. …in reply to @Chronotope
        Consider the pattern of Amazon's expending holdings and power? It always wants to own A to Z, not just X and Y. Consider its consumer electronics offerings. Consider its hosting and sale of content from YouTube creators for years now.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @Chronotope
          The end of this is your Fire TV becomes your new cable box.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo Chronotope’s avatar ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood -2 🙁

Search tweets' text